Prutton v. Marzall’s Empirical Analysis
191 F.2d 341 · 1951
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 1953
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Knutson v. Gallsworthy · Barrett Co. v. Koppers Co. · Asseff v. Marzall · Reichard v. Wells
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The essential point which appellants urge is that their formula provides a definition of the amount of sulphur to be added and specifies the narrow range of that amount. Their brief says, in this respect: 18 * * * * * * 19”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`Second, no one prior to the Appellant Prutton ever proposed the combined use with such character and amount of sulphur, of a material which functions as a detergent.' [Italics quoted.] 21 * * * * * * 22”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Only a portion of the sulphur used by Morway was to be in the so-called `corrosive' form.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.