United States v. Brothman’s Empirical Analysis
191 F.2d 70 · 1951
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Reed (1985), United States v. Dandy (1993)
35 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Michelson v. United States · United States v. Jones · United States v. Di Carlo · Boehm v. United States · United States v. De Vasto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here the indictment discloses lack of venue, going to trial without objection to venue is a waiver”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the same result may follow if the defendant is warned of the defect during the trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.