Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

191 F.2d 856

Docket No. 11268.

Gossmann v. Glenn

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-10-11

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1958

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Gossmann v. Glenn

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1951-10-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Skaggs, Hays & Fahey, Louisville, Ky., Wm. Mac Kenzie, Jr., Louisville, Ky., of counsel, for appellant.

Theron L. Cuadle, Charles Oliphant, Ellis N. Slack, Washington, D.C., David Walls, and Charles F. Wood, all of Louisville, Ky., Henry L. Spencer, Washington, D.C., Dee Hanson, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal from the dismissal by the District Court of the taxpayer's complaint, asserting a claim for refund of taxes based on the disallowance of a claimed deduction as an alleged ordinary and necessary business expense, came on to be heard; and the transcript of record and the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys for the contending parties have been duly considered;

¶2

And it appearing that the findings of fact of the District Court are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the court's conclusions of law are based upon sound and correct legal principles;

¶3

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed. 91 F.Supp. 1005.

/191/f2d/856 · .json · Public domain