Gleichman v. McGrath

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 10, 1951. Decided Oct. 24, 1951.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-10-24

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1953

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Cabell v. Clark

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1951-10-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Clarence W. Archibold, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Harold I. Baynton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Irving H. Saypol, U.S. Atty., New York City, James D. Hill, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel, Attorneys, Department of Justice, all of Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Affirmed on authority of Cabell v. Clark, 2 Cir., 162 F.2d 153.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Parties

appellant:Hanns Ed. GLEICHMAN
appellee:J. Howard McGRATH, Attorney General of the United States of America, as Successor to the Allen Property Custodian

Counsel

Clarence W. Archibold, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Harold I. Baynton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Irving H. Saypol, U. S. Atty., New York City, James D. Hill, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel, Attorneys, Department of Justice, all of Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.