Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

191 F.2d 859

Docket No. 11314.

Steve Taylor and Jennie Taylor v. Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-10-10

2 counsel of record

Relies on Palmer v. Chamberlin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1951-10-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1990

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Orgill, Maschke, Wickham & Loux, Cleveland, Ohio, Cornelius Maloney and L. F. Loux, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for appellants.

Paul Marshall, Cleveland, Ohio, Walter Rochow, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

¶2

And it appearing that the District Court found appellant Steve Taylor guilty of contempt of court in failing to make restitution in accordance with the order of the District Court entered October 21, 1949;

¶3

And it appearing that the court found that appellant Steve Taylor is financially able to comply with the order of the court, but knowingly, willfully, and intentionally disobeyed the order of the District Court;

¶4

And it further appearing that the findings of the court are amply supported by the record, and no reversible error being shown:

¶5

The order of the District Court is hereby affirmed.

/191/f2d/859 · .json · Public domain