Holz v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
191 F.3d 945 · 1999
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2012
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. Sullivan · Thompson v. Bowen · Lucy v. Chater · Luebertha INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee · 107 F.3d -986 - Ingram v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“nonexertional impairments significantly affect the [claimant's residual functional capacity] ... the guidelines are not controlling and may not be used to direct a conclusion of not disabled”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hensley v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.