Rolland v. Cellucci’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396N (§ 1915 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396R (§ 1919 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · Tommy Olmstead Commissioner Georgia Department of Human Resourcess v. L C Jonathan Zimring · Weinberger v. Kendrick · Cotton v. Hinton · United States v. City of Miami
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.