Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 FRD 581 - Malec v. Sanford

Malec v. Sanford’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

126
cited by 126 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp. · Stretten v. Wadsworth Veterans Hospital · Little v. Cox's Supermarkets · Hermes v. Hein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 126 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] movant's 56.1(a) statement should contain only factual allegations. It is inappropriate to allege legal conclusions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “supporting documents submitted with a motion that are not referred to in the statement of facts will be ignored.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The purpose of the 56.1 statement is to identify for the Court the evidence supporting a party's factual assertions in an organized manner: it is not intended as a forum for factual or legal argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.