Embury v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Parratt v. Taylor · Monroe v. Pape · Hudson v. Palmer · Wilson v. Garcia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although section 1094.5 may provide an adequate opportunity to challenge a procedurally flawed administrative hearing, it does not provide an adequate opportunity to challenge an administrative decision rendered without any process at all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.