Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 FSUPP2D 837 - Martinez v. Schlumberger Ltd.

Martinez v. Schlumberger Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
July 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (§ 404 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1109 (§ 409 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was sufficient to approve such a plan and result in its recommendation to the board of directors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Martinez
  2. “he hadn't heard of anything coming down.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Martinez

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.