Lennartz v. Quilty’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Firato v. Tuttle (1957), Clokey v. Wabash Railway Co. (1933)
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedLennartz v. Quilty
Relationships
Relies on Ogle v. Turpin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The recording laws are designed to afford protection to parties acting in good faith and relying upon them, and, in the absence of any notice or ground of suspicion, it is not the duty of a purchaser to obtain an admission of paj'ment from the holder of a note secured by a trust deed regularly released of record.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.