People v. Thingvold’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 76 Ill. 2d 19 - People v. Baptist · 66 Ill. 2d 317 - People v. Monroe · 127 Ill. 2d 499 - People v. Phillips · 66 Ill. 2d 325 - People v. Romero · 109 Ill. 2d 514 - People v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"That between the dates of December 1, 1983 and the 30th of April, 1986, in the County of Winnebago and the State of Illinois, RAYMOND J. THINGVOLD committed the offense of Solicitation in that he, with the intent that the offense of murder be committed by George Nalan, encouraged or requested the said George Nalan to commit the offense of murder, this offense being based upon a series of acts performed at different times, in violation of Paragraph 8-1 and 3-8, chapter 38, Illinois Revised Statutes."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]owhere * * * does the information allege that any of defendant's actions were performed within the limitation period. No facts are alleged that even the last of the series of acts occurred after June 24, 1984.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the information in the case before us was sufficiently explicit to enable defendant to prepare his defense and to apprise him that the last act occurred within the time prescribed by the statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.