191 Ill. App. 3d 622 - Schultz v. Siddens’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2 Ill. 2d 74 - Ney v. Yellow Cab Co. · 20 Ill. 2d 406 - Dini v. Naiditch · 64 Ill. 2d 380 - Davis v. Marathon Oil Co. · 94 Ill. 2d 52 - Gill v. Miller · 135 Ill. App. 3d 211 - McMahon v. Richard Gorazd, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We believe that the objective of the legislature in enacting section 11 — 1418 was obviously to limit the presence of farm tractors on highways. We cannot imagine, nor does the defendant suggest, any plausible reason for such a restriction other than to minimize the dangers which such vehicles pose to the safe movement of traffic. Such dangers include those associated with the necessarily slow speed at which such vehicles travel. We find, therefore, that section 11 — 1418 was designed for the protection of human life or property.” Schultz, 191 Ill. App. 3d at 626-27 , 548 N.E.2d at 89 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.