State v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
May 1975
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Osburn · State v. Fouts · State v. Murphy · State v. Crosby · In Re Estate of Hayden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a criminal prosecution it is the function of the jury in the first instance, and of the trial court after verdict, to determine what facts are established by the evidence, and before a verdict of a jury which has been approved by the trial court may be set aside on appeal on the ground of insufficiency of evidence, it must be made clearly to appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support the conclusion reached in the trial court. (State v. Walker, 198 Kan. 14 , 422 P. 2d 565 , Syl. ¶ 1; State v. Shaw, 195 Kan. 677 , 408 P. 2d 650 ; State v. Gregory, 191 Kan. 687 , 383 P. 2d 965 ; and State v. Ledbetter, 183 Kan. 302 , 327 P. 2d 1039 .)” (l. c. 111.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.