Ludwig v. Calloway’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2003
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allen, West & Bush v. Whetstone · Schwan v. Schwan · Eltringham v. Clarke · Succession of Pavelka · Succession of Drysdale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To have allowed the defendant a suspensive appeal would have defeated one of the purposes of the suit, and by the court maintaining custody and possession of the property, the matter was kept status quo so that neither party would gain advantage over the other.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weilbaecher v. Jee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.