Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 La. 427 - Ludeau v. Jacob

Ludeau v. Jacob’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1980
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hart v. Sansom · Andrews v. Sheehy · Edwards v. Whited · Tell v. Senac · Lotz v. Iberville Bank & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A judgment absolutely null may be attacked by anyone against whom it is sought to be enforced. The nullity may be invoked by any person who would be affected by the judgment. Bernard v. Vignaud, 1 Mart., N.S., 1, 8; Quine v. Mayes, 2 Rob. 510 ; Williams v. Clark, 11 La.Ann. 761 ; Simpson v. Hope, 23 La.Ann. 557 ; and Andrews v. Sheehy, 122 La. 464 , 47 So. 771 ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.