Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 Md. 555 - Barber v. State

Barber v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
5
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Reed v. State (1978), Stevenson v. State (1980)

62 state decisions

21019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 28 Cal. 2d 699 - People v. Simmons · Wilson v. State · Davis v. State · State v. Haas · People v. Mleczko

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the case at bar we think that the refusal of the accused to deny the charge of ownership cannot be treated as acquiescence, for he had been told by the police, as well as by his own attorney, that he had ‘a perfect right’ to decline to make any statement. Under the circumstances, we think the court erred in declining to strike out the testimony of Officer Rudy as to what Holmes said about the ownership of the trousers, in Barber’s presence, not because it was hearsay, but because it would not support an inference of admission of guilt under the circumstances.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.