191 Mich. App. 48 - Miller v. Ochampaugh’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
2 district · 5 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had the Legislature wished to create a subjective standard, it could have worded the dramshop act accordingly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“adoption of a subjective standard would essentially do away with the dramshop cause of action,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.