Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

191 Misc. 678

Tarr v. Seekonk Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1948-04-01

Relies on United States v. Murphy

Decided 1948-04-01

Per Curiam.

¶1The plaintiff may not recover in an action for maintenance and cure for items included in a recovery in his *679action for full indemnity (Krey v. United States, 123 F. 2d 1008). The record of the trial does not disclose whether the item of wages for which a recovery was had in the indemnity action is identical with the item of maintenance in the present case.

¶2The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered* with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

¶3Hammer, Church and Eder, JJ., concur.

¶4Judgment reversed, etc.

/191/misc/678 · .json · Public domain