Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 MO 205 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 1975
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1975

10 state decisions

4019051910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Eaton · State v. Smith · State v. Melvin · State v. Webb · State v. Hoffman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant could not be tried upon the first information, so long as the second was pending un quashed. Under the provisions of section 2522, Revised Statutes 1899', it was a matter of no consequence to the defendant whether the court quashed or refused to quash the first information, for its force and vitality was suspended by the filing of the second information, and such suspension remained so long as there -was no disposition of the second information. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.