Kunze v. Stang’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
August 1989
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Grenz v. Werre · Simon v. Carroll · Larson v. Meyer · Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Johnston's Fuel Liners, Inc. · Moe v. Kettwig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““8. On a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the verdict was rendered and such motion should not be granted unless the evidence shows that the moving party is entitled to judgment on the merits as a matter of law. “9. A motion for a new trial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and a denial of such a motion will only be overturned on appeal when it is clear that there was a manifest abuse of discretion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.