Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 NW2D 682 - Harper v. Coad

Harper v. Coad’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2000

4 state decisions

101971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skinner v. Spann · Fry v. Feamster · Bromberg v. McArdle · Holsteen v. Thompson · In Re Estate of Stephenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as permitted by this rule there shall be no joinder of any other cause of action and no counterclaim. But any party may perfect or quiet title to the property, or have an adjudication of the rights of any or all parties as to any or all matters growing out of or connected with it, including liens between them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.