Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 Okla. 453 - Harrison v. Eaves

Harrison v. Eaves’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Sapulpa (1984), Carpenter v. Carpenter (1982)

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

80194219501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Exploration Co. v. Robins · Phelan v. Roberts · Cassidy v. Gould · Johnson v. Rowe · Moorman v. Pettit

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The claim of limitations and laches rests upon the fact that there was some evidence to show that plaintiff knew or should .have known of the typographical error with respect to the range number given in the trust agreement. While it is not clear just when this first came to the attention of the plaintiff, the evidence shows that all parties interested in the trust had proceeded on the presumption that the agreement correctly set forth the property involved and that the trustee had at all times dealt with the lands in Range 3 W. and had faithfully performed the duties of his trust ’ and had never repudiated the same. Under these circumstances even though plaintiff knew or was charged with knowledge of the typographical error in the instrument no statute of limitations would begin to run thereon so long as the trust was being recognized and performed in accordance with its intent and purpose; * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.