Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 Okla. 670 - State v. Duerkson

State v. Duerkson’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2018

14 state decisions

6019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kurn v. Margolin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when a trial is forced with such dispatch as to result in depriving an interested party of reasonable opportunity to prepare for trial, and secure witnesses.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “whether the grant or denial of the motion operates in the furtherance of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.