Ross v. Holiday Inn’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Horns v. Brown · 149 So. 2d 188 - McGinnis v. Moreau · 148 So. 2d 326 - Barber v. Lake Charles Pipe and Supply Company · 161 So. 2d 374 - Fruchtzweig v. Southern Specialty Sales Company · Turner v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Courts ordinarily will not upset a factual determination by an administrative agency based upon the acceptance of one of two or more opposing versions of an incident by witnesses; and when the evidence presented at an administrative hearing is open to several reasonable constructions, the courts will accept the construction of the evidence which the administrative agency has reasonably made in reaching its factual determination. Ross v. Holiday Inn, 191 So.2d 335 (La.1966).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.