191 So. 2d 349 - Hall v. Doyal’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2016
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Horns v. Brown · 134 So. 2d 384 - Turner v. Brown · Grimble v. Brown · 148 So. 2d 321 - Lee v. Brown · 170 So. 2d 758 - Gardere v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... the findings of the administrative agency must be supported by competent evidence, and incompetent evidence admitted at the hearing will be disregarded by the courts upon their judicial review to determine if the agency’s findings are supported by sufficient evidence as required by law. Gardere v. Brown, La. App. 1 Cir., 170 So.2d 758 . [[Image here]] On judicial review of the unemployment agency’s finding, the court cannot redetermine the sufficiency of proof nor the agency’s credibility evaluations nor its reasonable factual inferences, so long as the agency’s findings are supported by some competent evidence. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In the absence of fraud, the judicial review of agency findings in unemployment compensation matters is statutorily limited to (a) whether the facts found by the agency are supported by competent evidence produced at the agency hearing and, if so (b) whether such facts do as a matter of law justify the agency action. LSA-R.S. 23:1634; Gardere v. Brown, La.App. 1 Cir., 170 So.2d 758 ; Lee v. Brown, La.App. 3 Cir., 148 So.2d 321 ; Turner v. Brown, La.App. 3 Cir., 134 So.2d 384 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““consistently found that the administrative finding of fact is supported by ‘sufficient’ evidence — and thus beyond the scope of revision or rejection upon judicial review — , when the administrative finder of fact evaluates as correct the testimony of one witness testifying for one party, despite contradicting testimony by one or more witnesses for the other party.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.