191 So. 3d 615 - State v. Mahogany’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey · 337 So. 2d 475 - State v. McCarroll · 575 So. 2d 421 - State v. Richardson · 389 So. 2d 1302 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mr. Mahogany was sentenced on June 3, 2014, ánd on September 9, 2015, the trial court permitted Mr. Mahogany to file out of time motions for new trial and post-verdict judgment of acquittal. Both motions were denied that same day. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 853 and 821, mandate that those motions be ruled on prior to sentencing. Generally, where the trial court has not ruled on the motions prior to sentencing it is an error patent, requiring the sentence be vacated and the matter remanded for re-sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.