Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 SW2D 747 - Warner v. Winn

Warner v. Winn’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

1 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2003

1 district · 18 state decisions

401945195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co. · Wagner Supply Co. v. Bateman · De La Vega v. League · Henderson v. Chesley · Crawford v. El Paso Sash Door Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * it can hardly be said that each and every covenant or provision relating to property held in common carries with it the implication that no partition shall be had. Consequently, it is necessary in each case to examine the particular con tract involved and from the provisions thereof determine whether or not the parties impliedly contracted against partition. If they did not then the right of partition is absolute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein Building Corporation
  2. “It seems reasonably clear that when parties contract for the drilling of wells, and such drilling is either made the consideration for the transfer of a mineral estate or is necessary to extend or perpetuate a lease, it must be inferred that the parties to the drilling agreement did not intend for the estate to be partitioned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Long v. Hitzelberger

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.