Woodson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 249th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Long v. State · Garcia v. State · State v. Markovich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A statute is unconstitutionally vague if it fails to “give the person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited” or “provide explicit standards for those who apply them.” Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108 , 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2298-99 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972); accord State v. Markovich, 77 S.W.3d 274, 279 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); Coggin v. State, 123 S.W.3d 82, 87 (Tex.App.-Austin 2003, pet. ref'd).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Childress v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.