Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 SW3D 599 - Matheney v. Commonwealth

Matheney v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2022

22 state decisions

120200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 857

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Edelman v. Jordan · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Connally v. General Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only if the misconduct is 'flagrant', or if each of the following three conditions is satisfied: (1) proof of defendant's guilt is not overwhelming; (2) defense counsel objected; and (3) the trial court failed to cure the error with a sufficient admonishment to the jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “A person is guilty of manufacturing methamphetarnine when he knowingly and unlawfully... [w]ith intent to manufacture methamphetamine possesses two (2) or more chemicals or two (2) or more items of equipment for the manufacture of methamphetamine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that one must possess two or more chemicals or items of equipment with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine to fall within the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.