Vick v. Siegel’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2012
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. Cary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““# * * The assignments of error were in fact filed in the clerk’s office within sixty days after final judgment. Defendant was also given notice within that period of plaintiff’s purpose to appeal. * # * There has been, we think, a substantial compliance with the rule. While it is plainly made the duty of counsel to designate for printing the parts of the record specified in Rule 5:1, Sec. 6(d), we hold that failure to designate the assignments of error in this case is not sufficient ground for dismissing the writ of error.” See Avery v. County School Board, 192 Va. 329, 331, 332 , 64 S. E. 2d 767, 769 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jackson v. Prestage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.