Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 Wash. 394 - Moore v. Webster

Moore v. Webster’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
October 1979
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Toon v. McCaw · Farmers State Bank of Newport v. Lamon · Shuey v. Adair · Union MacHinery & Supply Co. v. Taylor-Morrison Logging Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““One who executes a note in his own name, with nothing on the face of the note showing his agency, cannot introduce parol evidence to show that he executed it for a principal, or that the payee knew that he intended to execute it as agent.” (p. 396)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There is no language in the note which raises even a slight ambiguity or creates any doubt as to the meaning of the instrument, or that remotely suggests that the makers were acting for another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.