191 Wis. 2d 431 - State v. Gudenschwager’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Huml v. Vlazny (2006), State v. Rodriguez (2002)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 107 Wis. 2d 400 - Loy v. Bunderson · Michigan Coalition of Radioactive Material Users, Inc. v. Griepentrog · Grand Jury Proceedings of Beverly v. United States · Lopez v. Heckler · State v. Leach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appellate court will sustain a discretionary act if it finds that the trial court (1) examined the relevant facts, (2) applied a proper standard of law, and (3) using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) makes a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits of the appeal; (2) shows that, unless a stay is granted, it will suffer irreparable injury; (3) shows that no substantial harm will come to other interested parties; and (4) shows that a stay will do no harm to the public interest.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is well established that federal cases may provide persuasive guidance to the proper application of state law copied from federal law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.