State v. Bunch’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2019
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Washington · 155 Wis. 2d 633 - State v. Pulizzano · 100 Wis. 2d 700 - State v. Copening · 173 Wis. 2d 343 - In Interest of Shawn BN · 110 Wis. 2d 431 - State v. Pepin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the law prefers less drastic alternatives, if available and practical.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he trial court must determine, in light of the whole proceeding, whether the [claimed error] is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the circuit court judge is present at the trial and is therefore better able to understand what occurred ... the circuit court is in a particularly good 'on-the-spot' position to evaluate factors such as a statement's 'likely impact or effect upon the jury'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.