Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 W. Va. 370 - Williams v. Cummings

191 W. Va. 370 - Williams v. Cummings’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2018

12 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 160 W. Va. 567 - Stern Bros., Inc. v. McClure

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “West Virginia Code § 56-1-1(a)(7) provides that venue may be obtained in an adjoining county '[i]f a judge of a circuit be interested in a case which, but for such interest, would be proper for the jurisdiction of his court....' This statute refers to a situation under which a judge might be disqualified, and therefore it is in conflict with and superseded by Trial Court Rule XVII, which addresses the disqualification and temporary assignment of judges.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Under Article VIII, Section 8 of the Constitution of West Virginia ... administrative rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia have the force and effect of statutory law and operate to supersede any law that is in conflict with them.”); Williams v. Cummings, 191 W.Va. 370, 372 , 445 S.E.2d 757, 759 (1994) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.