Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 A3D 1149 - Commonwealth v. Johnson

Commonwealth v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Cooper · Commonwealth v. Patterson · 2016 Pa. Super. 257 - Commonwealth v. Hicks · Commonwealth v. Zambelli · 2016 Pa. Super. 132 - Commonwealth v. Mickel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The weight of the evidence is exclusively for the finder of fact, who is free to believe all, none or some of the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “unless it is so contrary to the evidence as to shock one's sense of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the trial court's exercise of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.