Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 A3D 126 - Commonwealth v. Hemingway

Commonwealth v. Hemingway’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Adams v. Williams · Florida v. Bostick · Mincey v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we must determine whether the record supports the trial court's factual findings and whether the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are correct. We may only consider evidence presented at the suppression hearing. In addition, because the defendant prevailed on this issue before the suppression court, we consider only the defendant's evidence and so much of the Commonwealth's evidence as remains uncontradicted when read in the context of the record as a whole. We may reverse only if the legal conclusions drawn from the facts are in error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.