Waterman v. Kramer

¶1Order setting aside verdict reversed, with costs, and verdict unanimously reinstated, with costs. The evidence presented a fair question of fact for the jury, and their decision thereon should not be disturbed. If there is any preponderance in favor of the defendant, it is not sufficient to justify interfering with the jury’s verdict. Present—'Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ.