Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

192 Ala. 117

Ex parte Singleton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 1915

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1915-04-08

<p> Mandamus. </p> <p>Infants; Removal of Disability; Petition. — Construing §§ 4505-6 Code 1907, it is held that a minor whose father was living at thie time, though in another state, had no right to file a petition to be relieved of the disabilities of nonage.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1924

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Writ denied · Decided 1915-04-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM. —

¶1Section 4505 of the Code of 1907, in providing for the relief of minors from the disabil*118ities of nonage, authorizes the petition to be filed: First, by the father, then by the mother if the father is dead second, by the minor, when he had no father or mother or guardian; and third, by the guardian, when the minor has one, and has no living father or mother. It will be observed that the minor has no right to file the petition except when he has no living parent or guardian, and this is the case whether the parent is or is not a nonresident. Section 4506 merely fixes the venue, and does not give the minor the right to file the petition if his parent is a nonresident, but merely requires it to be filed in the. district in which the minor resides, if the parent is a nonresident. As it appears that the father of A. E. Singleton,'Jr., was living when the petition was filed by said Singleton, Jr., the statute gave him no right to do so, notwithstanding his father was living in Georgia, and as the chancery court properly dismissed the petition, the mandamus is denied.

¶2Mandamus denied.

Anderson, C. J., and McClellan, Sayre, and Somerville, JJ., concur.
/192/ala/117 · .json · Public domain