Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

192 Ct. Cl. 952

Hamilton

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1970

United States Court of Claims · decided 1970-05-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1971

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2501

Relies on Mathis v. United States · Webster v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1970-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Military fay; discharge; limitation of actions. — Plaintiff, a former enlisted man in the Army, was dishonorably discharged following court-martial proceedings in 1957. His petition filed January 7, 1970, seeks to have his discharge set aside and to recover pay forfeitures. The case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition, to which motion plaintiff has filed no response and to which the time for responding has expired under the Rules of the court. Upon consideration thereof, without oral argument, the court concluded on the basis of the decisions by this court in Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 145, 391 F. 2d 938 (1968), and Webster v. United States, 179 Ct. Cl. 917 (1967), that plaintiff’s alleged claim is barred by the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501. On May 1, 1970 the court granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

/192/ctcl/952 · .json · Public domain