Pike County v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis
192 F. 11 · 1911
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1930
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Nottawa · Hill v. Walker · Spencer v. Pike County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Motion by W. H. Glune that we make a contract with. T. E. Spencer, of Monticello, N. Y., for a safe for treasurer’s office for the price of $1,250.00, and steel tiles for the commissioners’ vault $2,200.00, and filled vestibule doors for the commissioners’ vault and prothonotary’s vault for the sum of 81,200.00. Total contract price for same being $4,650.00, and payments for the same being as follows: $650.00, on delivery of material and completion of work; and $1,000.00 per year payable in December of each year, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum until same is paid. The commissioners reserve the right, to pay the total amount sooner, if they so desire. The contractor to pay all expenses of delivery and cartage of material. Seconded by H. S. Al-bright. Mr. Hatton voting no.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“‘•It is also hereby expressly agreed and understood that the foregoing embodies all the agreements made between us in. any way, hereby waiving all claims or verbal or other agreements of any nature not embodied in this contract.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.