Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 F.1d 314 - Hooks v. Vet

Hooks v. Vet’s Empirical Analysis

192 F. 314 · 1911

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
June 1989
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1989

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3019111920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If, however, we concede the contention of the plaintiff in error that the verdict should have been joint, and not several, and that it was error to enter the several judgment on the verdict, it seems that it was certainly error without injury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.