Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 F.1d 572 - In re Tanner

In re Tanner’s Empirical Analysis

192 F. 572 · 1911

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
November 1933
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1933

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

30191119201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Firestone v. Harvey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Tins ground for denying a discharge was evidently leveled particularly at the practice of making false statements of one’s financial condition by a buyer or borrower, for the purpose of obtaining from the person to whom such false statement is made, in writing, the articles or money desired ‘on credit.’ The false statement in writing which is enough to deny a discharge implies a statement knowingly false, or made recklessly, without an honest belief in its truth, and with a purpose to mislead or deceive, and thereby obtain from’ the person to whom it is made property upon credit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In my opinion * * * the indemnity bond in question is not property within the meaning of the statute, and, if it is, it was not obtained on ‘credit,’ because the relation of debtor and creditor did not exist after the bond was obtained any more than' before.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.