Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 F.1d 695 - In re Currier

In re Currier’s Empirical Analysis

192 F. 695 · 1912

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 1942
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1942

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

101912192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ottenot v. . New York Lackawanna and Western Railway Co. · In re Assigned Estate of Passmore · Waterman v. A. & W. Sprague Manufacturing Co. · 4 Indian Terr. 498 - In re Gibson · Gilbert v. . Lydecker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An acknowledgment or promise contained in a writing, signed by tbe party to be charged thereby, is tbe only competent evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take a case out of tbe operation of this title. But this section does not alter tbe effect of a payment of principal or interest.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.