Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

192 F.2d 1017

Docket No. 12828.

Lamm v. Commissioner

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 17, 1951.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-12-17

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1962

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Lamm v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1951-12-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Harry R. Horrow, Francis N. Marshall, Claude H. Hogan, Jr. and Thomas E. Haven, all of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

¶2Ellis N. Slack, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., A. F. Prescott, Morton K. Rothschild and Harry Marselli, Sp. Assts. to- Atty. Gen., for respondent.

¶3Before MATHEWS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, 15 T.C. 305.

/192/f2d/1017 · .json · Public domain