Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 F.2d 121 - Jarecki v. Whetstone

Jarecki v. Whetstone’s Empirical Analysis

192 F.2d 121 · 1951

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
February 1964
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Cobbledick v. United States · Alexander v. United States · Berger v. Brannan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) To enforce summons. If any person is summoned under the internal revenue laws to appear, to testify, or to produce books, papers, or other data, the district court of the United States for the district in which such person resides shall have jurisdiction by appropriate process to compel such attendance, testimony, or production of books, papers, or other data. “(b) * * *.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.