Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 F.2d 186 - Major v. Phillips-Jones Corp.

Major v. Phillips-Jones Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

192 F.2d 186 · 1951

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2011

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

501951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hargrove v. American Cent. Ins. · Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. v. Timms & Howard, Inc. · Myers v. New York State Tax Commission · Loeb v. Kivo · Mamlin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the review on appeal is from the Court's judgment as though no jury had been present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.