Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

192 F.2d 423

Docket No. 10983.

Brunelle v. Commissioner

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-10-18

3 counsel of record

Relies on Brunelle v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1951-10-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1996

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Scott P. Crampton, Washington, D. C., with whom Darius F. Prince and Dwight D. Taylor, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for petitioner.

¶2Carlton Fox, Sp. Asst, to the Atty. Gen., with whom Ellis N. Slack and Robert N. Anderson, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., were on the brief, for respondent.

¶3Rollin H. Transue and Lee A. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., and Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for respondent.

¶4Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6The judgment of the Tax Court of the United States is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Murdock. 15 T.C. 766.

/192/f2d/423 · .json · Public domain