In re Regency, Inc.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 23, 1951.

Decided Dec. 5, 1951.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-12-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1974

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on In re Regency, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1951-12-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bertram K. Wolfe, Philadelphia, Pa. (Eichmann & Seiden, Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), for appellants, Jean G. L. Cassel van Doom and Marij V. Cassel van Doom.

¶2Paul T. Huckin, Englewood, N. J., for appellee.

¶3Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and Mc-LAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We have examined the briefs and record in this case and have considered the arguments advanced by the appellants. We perceive no error of law and the findings of fact made by the referee find full support in the evidence. Consequently the judgment of the court below will be affirmed. 96 F.Supp. 535.