Danford v. Winter’s Empirical Analysis
192 F.2d 937 · 1951
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Kincade v. Mikles · Comstock v. Group of Institutional Investors Holding First & Refunding Mortgage 5% Gold Bonds of Missouri Pac. R. · Lay v. Wissman · Conover v. Hasselman · Sully v. Goldsmith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To constitute notice of an infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating the same, the person to whom it is negotiated must have had actual knowledge of the infirmity or defect, or knowledge of such facts that his action in taking the instrument amounted to bad faith.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.